ACCESSIBILITY FOR ONTARIANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT ALLIANCE UPDATE
PLEASE WIDELY CIRCULATE OUR NEW TORONTO STAR GUEST COLUMN ON THE ONTARIO ELECTION'S DISABILITY ACCESSIBILITY ISSUES
September 29, 2011
With just one week to go until
We encourage you to:
* Circulate this column to as many friends, family members and co-workers as you can to inform them about this election's disability accessibility issues. Email it to others. Print up copies to hand out to others. Post it on your Facebook wall or your website, if you have one. Tweet it to your followers, if you are on Twitter.
* Contact your local media and urge them to cover this issue. Forward this column to them.
* Email letters to the editor at the Toronto Star about this column. You can write the Star at: email@example.com
* Send copies of this column to candidates in your riding.
* Visit the Toronto Star web page where this column is posted, and indicate on it if you like the column. Visit: http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorialopinion/article/1061506--disturbing-silence-from-hudak-on-accessibility
Send us your feedback. You can always write us at: firstname.lastname@example.org
Disturbing silence from Hudak on accessibility
At risk in this election are our hard-won gains to make
Over 1.5 million Ontarians with disabilities still face too many barriers when trying to get a job, shop, or use public services — like steps in public transit stations, a municipality that doesn’t post new information on its website in easily provided formats accessible to blind computer-users, or new fancy electronic kiosks for getting public services or goods that people with disabilities (and many others) find hopelessly user-unfriendly.
Accessibility is good for business. Businesses want a
bigger pool of prospective workers and customers. Research shows that achieving
accessibility makes money for
Accessibility helps everyone. If bus drivers announce route stops, it helps blind people like me, who had to fight for this. It helps sighted passengers who can’t see outside through crowds or bad weather. Ramps for wheelchairs also help anyone with strollers or shopping carts. Accessible websites help people like me who use talking computers. They also help smartphone web-surfers without disabilities.
The McGuinty government gets credit for passing a good
Disabilities Act in 2005, requiring
What will our next government do to ensure that
When asked not to slash gains we’ve made in legislation or
regulations, the Conservatives are silent. This is especially worrisome, since
they promise to cut at least 30 per cent of all
When asked to strengthen implementation of the Disabilities Act or to effectively enforce it, the Conservatives are silent. We fought for that law for 10 years.
When asked to ensure the government doesn’t use our tax
dollars to erect new disability barriers, the Conservatives are silent. They
don’t agree to any action to make elections accessible to the more than one
million voters with disabilities, such as measures PCs themselves proposed in
2010. The Conservatives won’t promise steps they pledged in the 2007 election,
The Conservatives said only that they’d work with us. That’s miles short of our needs. The other parties promised specific action and pledged not to weaken laws we’ve won to date.
In 1995, Mike Harris promised a Disabilities Act in his first term and to work with us on it. His government strongly resisted keeping its word. It didn’t work cooperatively with us.
It stalled six years before passing a weak law halfway through its second term. That law mainly included only voluntary measures and wasn’t enforceable. The minister who authored it later admitted it was too weak.
In opposition (2003-2007), the Conservatives were more supportive. Dramatically breaking with their past, John Tory supported McGuinty’s new, stronger accessibility law in 2005. The Conservatives proposed amendments we wanted, to make it even stronger.
In the 2007 election, Tory pledged to strengthen implementation of the 2005 Disabilities Act. In 2010, under Hudak, the Conservatives supported our call for stronger voting accessibility measures.
It’s not too late for the Conservatives to act. To commit to strengthen, not weaken, our gains under the 2005 Disabilities Act, would build on the party’s stance in opposition. Recently a Toronto Conservative candidate publicly pledged to call Hudak to urge him to make the commitments we seek. All Conservative candidates should do the same.
The Star reports that the Conservatives said they refused our request because their platform addresses our needs. But their platform only offers needed reform to disability social assistance. That doesn’t excuse inaction on broad accessibility issues. It doesn’t excuse risking cuts to gains we’ve made.
This shouldn’t be an unfair choice between more income for the poorest people with disabilities versus improving accessibility for all Ontarians with disabilities. Do both! A government can fix social assistance while also moving us forward on the path to accessibility.
In 2005 the Disabilities Act won all-party support and a standing ovation. We urge the Conservative party to build on that historic non-partisan consensus by agreeing to strengthen, not weaken, gains we’ve made — by meeting or beating the other parties’ commitments.
David Lepofsky is a